Direct filing to HMRC is pending HMRC recognition. Start your bookkeeping free now — filing switches on the moment we're approved.
How it worksFeaturesPricingFree toolsFAQLog in
← All tools

Explainer

Buy-to-let: personal vs limited company

An even-handed look at the trade-offs of holding rental property personally versus in a limited company — what to weigh up, and why this one genuinely needs professional advice.

This is an explainer, not a recommendation.

We deliberately don’t give you a “personal vs company” number. The honest answer depends on too many moving parts — and a wrong, over-confident figure here could cost you far more than it saves. Before you act, speak to a qualified accountant or tax adviser about your specific situation.

What people are really weighing up

The appeal of a company is that it sidesteps the Section 24 mortgage-interest restriction — a company deducts interest in full and pays Corporation Tax on its profit rather than income tax. For a higher-rate, heavily-mortgaged landlord building a portfolio, that can look compelling.

The catches that often tip the balance

  • Moving existing property in is a sale. Transferring personally-held property to a company is normally treated as a disposal at market value — potentially triggering Capital Gains Tax and Stamp Duty (including the additional-property surcharge).
  • Mortgages. Company buy-to-let lending is often more limited and more expensive.
  • Running costs. Company accounts, filings and accountancy fees add up every year.
  • Getting money out is taxed again. Profit left in the company is taxed once; taking it as salary or dividends is taxed again in your hands.

Our honest position

For most landlords with one or a few properties, the costs and complexity of incorporating outweigh the benefit — but there are real cases where it makes sense. Because it turns on your full financial picture, this is exactly the decision to take to a professional. Quarterwise keeps your personal property records and MTD filings tidy whichever route you choose.

This page is general information, not tax or legal advice. Always get advice specific to your circumstances before restructuring how you hold property.

Common questions

Is it better to own a buy-to-let personally or through a company?
There is no universal answer — it depends on your income, how many properties you hold, whether they’re mortgaged, how long you’ll hold them, and how you want to take the money out. It’s a genuinely complex decision with significant tax consequences, so it should be made with a qualified accountant or tax adviser.
Why do some landlords incorporate?
Companies aren’t subject to the Section 24 finance-cost restriction, so they can deduct mortgage interest in full, and they pay Corporation Tax rather than income tax on profits. For some higher-rate, heavily-mortgaged landlords building a portfolio, that can be attractive.
What are the catches of incorporating?
Moving existing properties into a company is usually a sale at market value — potentially triggering Capital Gains Tax and Stamp Duty Land Tax (including the surcharge). Company buy-to-let mortgages can be pricier, there are running and accountancy costs, and extracting profit (dividends/salary) is taxed again. These can easily outweigh the benefits.

Be ready for Making Tax Digital, the easy way.

Set up your first property in two minutes. Free forever, no card needed, cancel any time.

Start free todaySee how it works
Join landlords across the UK getting their tax sorted.